Why the federal government responded differently to different civil rights protests

McAdam discusses how and why the federal government responded differently to different civil rights protests:  in Birmingham in 1961, the federal government intervened to protect protestors from violence; in In Albany in 1962 (as we saw in the documentary!), the federal government did not intervene despite mass arrests of peaceful demonstrators.  What explains the differing federal reactions to these two moments?  (These cases are discussed on 171; McAdam’s larger point is explained across 170-171).

Do you think that economic growth should continue to be an essential component

Do you think that economic growth should continue to be an essential component of any development index and, hence, an essential development goal for countries of the Global South? What are the main arguments that you would use to support your answer to this question?

 

 

Characteristics voters choose  when looking for president  depending on the socioeconomic and political environment

What characteristics do you think voters look for when choosing a president? Discuss characteristics voters choose  when looking for president  depending on the socioeconomic and political environment – lack of jobs, riots, COVID-19, environmental concerns and other issues etc.? Explain your answer

Explain   importance of executive orders are one of the main ways that president’s can influence policy

Executive orders are one of the main ways that president’s can influence policy, especially because they can go around congress and simply direct the bureaucracy to perform or not perform an action. For your original post this week, do internet research on an executive order, explain   importance of executive orders are one of the main ways that president’s can influence policy and what it did. Finally, tell us if it was reviewed by the Supreme Court and, if so, what they held when they looked at it.

Discuss the problems associated with data breaches

Data Breaches (Company Perspective) Discuss the problems associated with data breaches that resulted in unauthorized disclosure of consumer records and other private information held by a company, please identify and discuss one specific breach (2019 or later). What notification laws applied and did the responsible company comply with those laws?

address the following issues:

Incident response and remediation (including policy changes, costs, etc.)
Impacts to reputation
Responding to legal actions or investigations

Please cite scholarly sources only

Domestic parents adoption

Domestic parents adoption is: (a) where a parent’s partner seeks to adopt the child of the partner, (b)an action seeking damages for substituting another child for adoption without the agreement of the prospective adopting parents,

(c) the same as black market adoption,

(d) where a step-parent seeks to adopt the child of the step-parent’s spouse

What role does the doctrine of precedent play in our legal system?

What role does the doctrine of precedent play in our legal system? In applying this doctrine, do judges merely ‘find and apply the law, or do they ‘make’ the law? Give examples in your answer.

Question 2 (5 marks)

Briefly explain the literal approach and the purposive approach to statutory interpretation

 

Question 3 (10 marks)

 

You are a single judge of the Supreme Court of NSW called upon to decide the interpretation of a section of Commonwealth legislation. The previous decisions on the question are below. Consider each in turn and give reasons for which is binding or most highly persuasive.

Mulder v Weezes (1980) – NSWSC;

Andrews v Watson (2014) – VSC Court of Appeal – Followed Mulder v Weezes but not the reasoning in that case;

Williamson v Michaels (2010) – Qld SC. Followed Mulder v Weezes though “reluctantly”;

Cooper v Hodson (2000) – High Court. Followed Mulder v Weezes based on the facts of the appellant case, though in obiter approved the reasoning in Kennedy v Bryant;

Kennedy v Bryant (1985) – Full Court of the Federal Court. Declined to follow Mulder v Weezes, holding it to be “plainly wrong”;

Which decision would you ultimately follow and why? Would it be helpful to have any further information? If so what and why?

 

Question 4 (5 marks)

 

Explain the concept of terra nullius and explain why it was held to be a “legal fiction” in the landmark case of Mabo No. 2.

 

 

 

Question 5 (10 marks)

 

You are a single judge of the Supreme Court of NSW considering a matter of common law. The previous decisions on the question are below. Consider each in turn and give reasons for which is binding or most highly persuasive.

 

Heather v Forrest (1930) – Court of Appeal England

 

Littles v Downer (2020) – Victorian Court of Appeal. Followed Baboa v Erics, stating it correctly stated the law.

 

Symonds v Lennard (1991) – House of Lords

 

Roberts v Ashton (1980) – Victorian Court of Appeal

 

Matthews v Coopers (2022) – High Court of Australia which held that the reasoning in Symonds v Lennard was correct, but distinguished that case on its facts and followed Baboa v Erics.

 

Baboa v Erics (2019) – Supreme Court of Canada

 

Which decision would you ultimately follow and why? Would it be helpful to have any further information? If so what and why?

 

Restorative justice depends upon direct involvement by participants

Restorative justice depends upon direct involvement by participants (victims, offender, community) Question 1 options:

True
False

 

Question 2 

Which level(s) of government play a role in administering the CJS?

Question 2 options:

Federal only
Federal, Provincial/Territorial, and Municipal
Federal and Provincial/Territorial

 

Question 3 

Which of the following is NOT a function of the criminal law?

Question 3 options:

Deterrence
Preventing inequalities in society
Maintaining order

 

Question 4 

 

When dispatching their job duties, Crown Counsel are generally immune from prosecution

Question 4 options:

True
False

 

Question 5 

 

The presumption of innocence is a central part of the

Question 5 options:

Inquisitorial system
Adversarial system
Both of the above

 

Question 6 

 

Crime victims cannot sue for damages from justice agencies that do not fill their mandate to protect citizens

Question 6 options:

True
False

 

Question 7 

According to nationwide research data, the majority of Canadian’s trust the CJS implicitly

Question 7 options:

True
False

 

Question 8 

 

Section 230(a) of the Criminal Code allows for a lesser punishment where death takes place while another offence is occurring (or as the culprit attempts to escape once having committed the other offence)

Question 8 options:

True
False

 

Question 9 

According to the crime control model, criminal justice should focus on

Question 9 options:

Ensuring the legal rights of all citizens, including suspects/offenders, are protected
The protection of communities and due process rights
The protection of communities and apprehension of criminals

 

Question 10 

The Canadian Criminal Justice System is a(n)

Question 10 options:

A mix of both
Inquisitorial system
Adversarial System

What is the meaning of Currency Pegging?

A currency peg is a policy that stabilizes the exchange rate between countries by establishing a fixed exchange rate for a nation’s currency with a foreign currency or a basket of currencies. The value of one currency in comparison to another is known as the currency exchange rate. Some currencies are fixed and pegged to another currency, while others are free-floating and their rates change according to market supply and demand. For business planning, pegging provides long-term predictability of exchange rates and contributes to economic stability. What is the meaning of Currency Pegging?

Medieval concepts of honor or religious concepts of morality

Foundational Concepts (20 Marks) 1. To what extent are medieval concepts of honor or religious concepts of morality still part of the contemporary Canadian legal system? Give one example of where such concepts still exist and one example of where such concepts have been rejected. (5 Marks) 2. Describe the doctrine of stare decisis and the rules pertaining to the application of precedents by courts of various levels. (5 Marks) 3.

Discuss an area of the law that has evolved to create a more fair, inclusive, and equal society. Include the previous legal position, the current legal position, and the seminal moment(s) of change. (10 Marks) PART B: Public Law and Private Law (25 Marks) Demonstrate your knowledge of Public Law (Criminal Law, Quasi-Criminal Law, Administrative Law) and Private Law (Contract Law and Tort Law) in the following scenario.

John works at Joe’s Garage as a general laborer. His duties usually include cleaning the floors, driving cars in and out of the shop, picking up parts from suppliers, etc. One day, the shop was short-handed and John volunteered to do the brake job on customer Mary’s vehicle. He told the shop foreman, “I’ve done this many times on my own car.

” The foreman allowed John to work on Mary’s car. After the service was completed, John took Mary’s vehicle for a test drive despite having no car insurance. While on the test drive, John drives the vehicle up to 80km/hr on a street where the speed limit is 40km/hr. He then runs a red light and collides with a vehicle driven by Jane. Jane, a single mom of a 3-year-old infant, is paralyzed by the accident.

Identify FIVE issues that will result in Public Law or Private Law consequences in this scenario.

For each issue, whether it is Public Law or Private Law, identify the parties on both sides of the issue, any possible defenses and the likely legal outcome. (5 Marks per Issue)