Matthias Matthias put the following Provision in his will

Matthias Matthias put the following provision in his will: “I leave my 200 shares of Starbucks stock to Carolyn.” At the time of his death, Starbucks had declared a stock split that left Matthias with 400 shares of Starbucks stock. What is Carolyn entitled to?

2. What if Matthias’s will stated: “I leave 200 shares of Starbucks stock to Carolyn.” The other facts remain the same. What is Carolyn entitled to?

The differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association

Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association. Describe the board for Ohio. Who is on the board? How does one become a member of the board?
Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.
How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
If a patient is from another culture, how would this regulation impact the nurse’s care/education?
Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).
How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
Has there been any change to the regulation within the past 5 years? Explain.

Need to simultaneously protect National security and citizens’ rights during times of war

The need to simultaneously protect national security and citizens’ rights during times of war was a dilemma for the Framers of the U.S. Constitution. Answer the following questions as it pertains to civilians, military members, foreign nationalsthreats, and foreign combatants.

How can the state be protected without compromising citizens’ rights?
Constitutional protections such as Habeas Corpus can be suspended under specific
conditions (such as war) to protect the public good from potential a . Is this “just”?
Do the rights of the many outweigh the rights of the few?

A Loss prevention officer at a local cosmetic store

Jennifer is a loss prevention officer at a local cosmetic store. She observes a female remove lipstick from a display case and place it in her pocket. The female then left the store without offering to pay for the merchandise. Jennifer arrests the female and returns her to the store and the security office. The manager of the store decides the value of the product is minimal and because it’s almost closing time advises Jennifer not to proceed with charges. Question: Since she hasn’t been charged yet, can Jennifer release the female? Explain.

 

2. Jill is a citizen who was shopping in a local clothing store when she heard a store employee yell out “Stop, thief!” Jill saw the employee run after two youths who had just run out of the store. Question: Would Jill be authorized to arrest any of the suspects? Explain your answer

 

3. Bobby is a citizen who drove to the local bank to get some money out of the machine. He saw a teenager sitting in the doorway. Bobby noticed a sign in the vestibule indicating ‘No Loitering’. Bobby told the teen he wasn’t allowed to be there. The two of them got into an argument and Bobby arrested the teen for loitering. Question: Under what authority did Bobby use to arrest the teen?

 

4. You are a police officer in the local police service. While patrolling one night you stop a motorist for speeding. During the traffic stop, you check the driver out through the police database. You are advised that there is a warrant outstanding for that person’s arrest for assault issued by a court within your jurisdiction. Question: Can you arrest the driver? Explain your answer.

The Case of R A.A

Please provide a case brief in the case of R A.A The brief should contain the following sections: (1) Style of Cause; (2) History of the Case; (3) Facts; (4) Issue; (5) Decision; (6) Reasoning. If you have already prepared the brief, you can copy and paste your answer into the space provided.

 

R. v. A.A., 2022 ONCA 639 (ontariocourts.ca)

The Fourth Amendment  

Listed below are 8 laws and 8 “businesses” that may have to follow several of the laws. 1. The Fourth Amendment     _______     a. Grace Hopper High School

2. USA Patriot Act                  _______     b. Turing Private Hospital

3. FERPA                               _______     c. S&C Cable ISP

4. HIPPA                                _______     d. MS and B Grocery Store

5. ECPA                                 _______     e. County Small Bank

6. SOX                                   _______     f. Walmart

7. US Copyright Law              _______     g. Mass General Public Hospital

8. DMCA                                _______    h. University of California

 

Describe each law in own words.  Describe an example of the law being used in a real world case, and provide the reference.

 

Think about the 8 businesses given above. For each business, choose of the laws and describe why and how they need to follow the law.  Provide references

Prosecution of D for robbing a store

Prosecution of D for robbing a store. The robber entered before closing, put on a salesperson’s uniform, and pretended to work there. After the store closed and everyone else left, the robber took off the uniform and stole all the DVD players. D denies involvement. To prove D’s guilt, the prosecution offers evidence that a month earlier; D stole all the DVD players from a different store using the same method. D denies committing the prior robbery, and objects. How should the court rule?

    1. The court should sustain the objection unless D was charged criminally for that robbery.
    2. The court should sustain the objection unless the prosecution convinces the court by a preponderance of the evidence that D committed the prior robbery.
    3. The court should sustain the objection unless the prosecution offers evidence sufficient to support a finding that D committed the prior robbery.
    4. The court should sustain the objection even if D admits committing the prior robbery.

Why the privilege of self-defense exists

Explain from a public policy perspective why the privilege of self-defense exists, Explain from a public policy perspective the concept of duty of retreat within the confines of self-defense,

  • Consider whether Model Penal Code Article III §3.04(2)(b) should be amended to either expand or retract the duty to retreat. Provide a public policy rationale concerning this change in policy. How might democracy affect how this code is adopted by different jurisdictions?

Breach of contract action by Opinion Survey

Breach of contract action by Opinion Survey Co. (P) against D, an unsuccessful presidential candidate. P claims that D failed to pay a large bill for political polling P had performed. D claims that she never hired P to do work for her. At trial, P calls W, a news reporter, and wishes to have W testify that during the campaign, he attended a press conference conducted by X, D’s husband, and that at that press conference, X said, “according to figures put together for us by the P Opinion Survey Co., we have a 19 percentage point lead over our closest rival.” Which of the following constitutes P’s strongest argument that the evidence of X’s statement is admissible?

    1. Because the making of X’s statement constitutes the very fact in issue, it is an act of independent legal significance, and is thus admissible as non-hearsay.
    2. Because X’s statement does not assert that D hired P, it is admissible non-hearsay.
    3. Because X was probably authorized to speak for D, X’s statement is admissible as an authorized admission.
    4. Because X was speaking about a matter within the scope of his employment, X’s statement is admissible as an agency admission under.

Ethical issues people face in everyday life

The video for this unit, My Brother’s Keeper, explored ethical issues people face in everyday life. Identify an ethical dilemma you have experienced. Annenberg Learner (2007). My brother’s keeper [Video]. https://www.learner.org/series/ethics-in-america-ii/my-brothers-keeper/

Answer the following questions:

What was the ethical problem?

How was it handled?

How could this problem have been avoided?

What recommendation would you make to the decision maker based on this ethical problem?