The National government claimed that the said ordinance/EO is not in accordance with law citing the Executive order from the office of the president of the Philippines with regards to Covid-19 response and guidelines.

Our country is still in the time of pandemic where the virus is still circulating though, the impact is not that hard and massive compared to it two years ago. The threat is still present that gives some Filipinos fear and anxiety specially going out for work, schools or whatever reasons. Facemask and alcohol are essential in combating the virus spread especially in a closed and unventilated area.

Different LGU’s management show a manifestation on what should be done and how they will protect its constituents. Province A has ordered through an executive order to its jurisdiction on the optional use of facemask in an open area where it has been supported by its local legislative body through and passed a provincial ordinance.

On the mandate of the law, the LGU has the autonomy and powers devolved should be exercised to its utmost intent. It is also true that the national government has the obligation to oversee the LGU as an agent of NG.

Read, analyze and make a comprehensive reaction, stand and position on the scenario below. Give insights, explanation, legal basis and examples if any to make a firm stand on your answer. Explain thoroughly according to all we have discussed in local and regional administration which bases on RA7160. (No copy paste, if so the grade will be zero)

The Westphalian system is based on the principle of international law that * 2 points each state has sovereignty over its territory and domestic affairs, to the exclusion of all external powers, on the principle of non-interference in another country’s domestic affairs.

This system has evolved and thereby producing our current understanding of nation-states which emphasizes internal cooperation to the detriment of surrendering sovereignty just to attain worldwide stability. O First sentence is true while the second sentence is false. O First sentence is false while the second sentence is true. O Both sentences are true. O Both sentences are false.

• What aspects of research in attachment are essential to consider in foster care placements or systems?
• What are some of the everyday situations in early life-span development that influence attachment style?
• In what way is attachment a bidirectional process?
• How do children with disorganized attachments’ lives look different from those with healthier attachments?
• How does attachment style early in life influence our attachments later in adulthood?
• How does the concept of attachment style apply to any of the following programmatic themes? You may want to review the Programmatic Themes document.
  • Self-care
  • Social justice
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Career connections
  • Ethics

REFERENCE:

Young children in the child welfare system are susceptible to behavioral and physiological dysregulation. These children need nurturing care to develop organized attachments to caregivers, synchronous care to support their physiological and behavioral regulation, and stable caregivers who can commit to them, supporting their sense of self and behavioral regulation. Without intervention at the parent and system level, most children involved with the child welfare system are unlikely to have these needs met. We present two models of an intervention designed to enhance parents' synchrony and nurturance and highlight aspects of the system that can improve the stability and commitment of caregivers. 

What is generational conflict? What arguments or accusations have you heard, and in what situations do you think these conflicts usually arise? Who, if anyone, do you think might profit from generational conflict and the sense that one’s own generation is under attack? Consider differences in social, religious, or political beliefs, or consider different responses to major events such as a pandemic.

Psychological essentialism.

Keil argues for a theory of psychological essentialism. He’s not the only one who makes this argument – Susan Gelman is a particularly strong proponent of this view as well. At its heart, psychological essentialism is the idea that we act on the world as if certain objects have “essences”—special, unseen entities, intrinsic to the objects that give those objects its defining characteristics. That is, there is something that makes a lemon a lemon, and something that makes a tiger a tiger. Critically, we do not reason about all objects as if they have these essences, only a certain kind of object: Natural Kinds—or objects that exist in nature. Keil in particular contrasts natural kinds with man-made objects (called artifacts).

Important to note: what makes this psychological is not a belief about whether these objects actually have essences. Whether a tiger has a specific tiger essence that makes it a tiger is a metaphysical question, which is for the philosophers to decide. Rather, for our purposes, we are interested in whether children act as if certain kinds of concepts have an essence. This view does not commit us to stating that children (or adults) believe that tigers have essences, just that they act as if they do have essences. The former is a philosophical question—the latter is a psychological one.

Question: What is your reaction to Keli’s book (1989) Chapters 8 and 9. Evaluating Keil’s experiments in light of these ideas about psychological essentialism.