We are exploring the role the media plays in a terrorist environment.  We know that many groups use the media to disseminate their propaganda.  This is most prevalent in democratic societies or those who enjoy “Freedom of the Press.”  We also know the dangers of allowing terrorist groups unfettered access to media outlets.  with this in mind address the following:  given the propensity for manipulation, are there any circumstances that might warrant the government to place restrictions on what the media can publish?  What might be restricted and how would you justify said restrictions?

Explain when a police officer may use deadly force in effecting an arrest or preventing escape. Identify the Supreme Court case which establishes limitations on the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers.

Define the criminal intent element required for stalking, and compare various statutory approaches to stalking criminal intent. Define the harm element required for stalking, and compare various statutory approaches to ascertaining harm.

The strength of our criminal justice system depends on its ability to be accurate and swift in convicting the guilty and in clearing the innocent. However, wrongful convictions do happen sometimes. Identifying and understanding the causes of wrongful convictions is critical to maintaining the integrity of our justice system.

look at case in which an inmate was wrongfully convicted and eventually released based upon new evidence.

Do  a word paper in which you do the following:

• Indicate if the wrongful conviction was based upon unethical practices by the police, court, probationary personnel, or witnesses.
• Describe how the conviction was appealed and whether the defendant received any reparations.
• Indicate if the justice system targeted those responsible for the wrongful conviction and whether they were prosecuted for their conduct.
• Describe what could be done to avoid such behaviors in the future.

Discuss the ethics of allowing confidential informants to commit crimes. Should they be allowed to do so? Why or why not? Make sure to address what would happen if confidential informants were not allowed to commit crimes. A good suggestion is to think about everything you’ve learned so far in this lesson, then decide which side you would support: should informants be allowed to commit crimes or not? Write a brief post with your reasoning as to why you believe so..