Global health crisis,

Respond to the questions in two separate argumentative essays • In these 2 argumentative essays, you must use one ethical theory to justify your thesis and respond to the questions. Then, use a second (i.edifferent) ethical theory to raise objections to your view, to show that there is another perspective to consider. Be sure to offer a response to the objections in order to provide more support to your argument. (Since this is the first argumentative essay, I’ve provided this argumentative structure to help you.• You will be assessed on the persuasiveness of your moral argument, the clarity of your writing, and the ability to incorporate relevant course readings.• Both of these questions are complex and involve more than one issue/topic from the course. You should select what you think are the most relevant issues for each question.

• Avoid direct quotations. Paraphrase to express the ideas in your own words. Indicate the author’s name and page number for the idea that you are
paraphrasing.
• Question: What were Boisjoly’s ethical obligations in this case and did he fulfill
them? Does he share any of the responsibility for the disaster? Is there
anything else he should have done?
(Please refer to Case 6 and Module 2 Moral Theories for essay 1)

Question: Should the solution to a global health crisis, like a pandemic, be driven by the market? Do you think companies are morally justified in insisting on no price controls for the COVID-19 vaccine once it is developed?