Why might many demographers and geographers consider physiological density a superior population density measurement?

Why might many demographers and geographers consider physiological density a superior population density measurement?

 

It compares arable land and demographics.

 

It is a better measure of the crude population.

 

It is compatible with environmental possibilism.

 

It reflects added pressure on available arable land.

 

It factors in other demographics like age and sex.