• Address how the DSM-5 addressed the problems/challenges described in the articles and weave in a discussion of what issues still remain?
• Share what your recommendations are related to best practice regarding cultural formulation when making a diagnosis?
• Conclude your paper with what you learned from researching and writing this paper.
• Please also start your paper with an introduction section that introduces your reader to what you will be writing about and why, and end your paper with a conclusion section that reiterates your most important points, talks about implications for counseling, and or shares what you learned from researching and writing this paper. Remember to cite sources and include them in your references section.

The two articles are:

Parzen, M. D. (2003). Toward a culture-bound syndrome-based insanity defense? Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 27(2), 131-155. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bellevue.edu/10.1023/A:1024217907209

White Kress, V. E., Eriksen, K. P., Rayle, A. D., & Ford, S. J. W. (2005). The DSM-IV-TR and Culture: Considerations for Counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(1), 97-104. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bellevue.edu/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00584.x