Explain Primary sources of law

Please name five secondary sources that summarize, discuss, or explain primary sources of law. When dealing with immigration case decisions, the reasons for the decision contain certain structural elements. Please name them all.

23. Please spell out the following title abbreviations in the space provided.

SC =

RSO = Revised Statutes of Ontario

s =

S.O. =

RSC =

SOR =

ss =
BC Reg. =

24. Please name three primary sources of law.

25. A correct legal citation of a case consists of several parts. Please explain each of those parts for the following citation: R v Miller (2010), 3 DLR (2d) 109 (Ont CA) by matching each component to its correct description

1) R. v. Miller:
2) 2010:
3) 3:
4) DLR:
5) 2d:
6) 109:
7) Ont CA:

a) Page number on which the case begins in the report volume
b) Year case is decided or published
c) Law report series number
d) Style of cause
e) Law report number
f) Jurisdiction and court
g) Name of the law report series

26. Please examine the following citation and select what is wrong with it: R v Vergos, [1993] 99 DLR (4th) 626

a) Comma is in the wrong place
b) Style of Cause is not italicized
c) Missing jurisdictions on the end
d) Brackets should be square

27. Please examine the following citation and select what is wrong with it: Young v Gary (2001), 63 OR (2d) 389 (HCJ)

a) Comma is in the wrong place
b) Style of Cause is not italicized
c) Missing jurisdictions on the end
d) Brackets should be square

28. Please examine the following citation and select what is wrong with it: R v Michaels [1987], 7 CCLT 209 (BCSC)

a) Comma is in the wrong place
b) Style of Cause is not italicized
c) Missing jurisdictions on the end
d) Brackets should be square

29. Please examine the following citation and select what is wrong with it: Ripton v Lippo
(1980), 2 SCR 192

a) Comma is in the wrong place
b) Style of Cause is not italicized
c) missing jurisdictions on the end
d) Brackets should be square

30. Please examine the following citation and select what is wrong with it: Daniels v Craigston
(1995), 26 OR (3rd) 209 (CA)

a) Comma is in the wrong place
b) Style of Cause is not italicized
c) Missing jurisdictions on the end
d) 3rd should be 3d

31. Please take the following citation and rewrite it correctly. (Disregard italics) [1993] Ontario v Ontario (Labour Relations Board) 327 3, SCR
32. Please take the following citation and rewrite it correctly. (Disregard italics) (QL) [1986], No 987 OJ Atlas v CIL Inc.

33. Please take the following citation and rewrite it correctly. (Disregard italics) R.S.O., c. H.8, Highway Traffic Act 1990

34. Please take the following citation and rewrite it correctly. (Disregard italics) 34 (2d) (2009) 5 OR (CA) Riggs v Monroe,

35. Please take the following citation and rewrite it correctly. (Disregard italics) SCR 217 [1997] R v Latimer, 1

R. v. Latimer, 1997 CanLII 405 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 217

36. Why is legal research important to the Immigration Consultant?

37. Describe the significance of each part of a neutral citation from an Ontario court and define what a neutral citation is.