Permanent residence as a Principal applicant
Tania has submitted her application for permanent residence as a principal applicant and has included her husband Marcos as her accompanying spouse. During the processing of her application, Marcos was diagnosed with kidney cancer and requires ongoing/expensive medical treatment and medications. What is most likely to occur?
Select one :
*Marco is not inadmissible because he is the spouse of the principal applicant.
*Marco is not admissible because his health condition does not endanger the health of Canadians
* if Marco is removed from Tania’s application, the case will be approved.
*The case may be refused because Marcos is inadmissible on health grounds because his medical condition will cause excessive demand on Canada’s health care system.
18. Amir become a permanent resident in 2009, but he never applied to become a Canadian citizen .last month, he was convinced of aggravated assault and robbery and sentenced to 12 years in prison .he was issued a deportation order as a result of this conviction. what course of action is available to him? Amir Can:
Select one:
*Apply for Canadian citizenship
*Apply to a federal court of Canada for judicial review
*File an appeal with the immigration appeal division
*File an appeal with the Immigration Division
17. with respect to the inadmissibility of a foreign national, which of the following statement is true:
Select one:
*Foreign nationals who have been acquitted of a crime must wait at least 5 years to apply for permanent or temporary residence in Canada.
*A good strategy for learning whether a foreign national is criminally inadmissible to Canada is to submit an application for rehabilitation to IRCC and check the box for information only, this application is free.
*Foreign nationals who are deemed rehabilitated are not required to disclose their conviction to IRCC.
*A foreign national may appeal the refusal of a permanent resident visa to the immigration and refugee board as long as he is not inadmissible on grounds of organized crime or serious criminality
16. Peter Morton was convicted in California for gross vehicle manslaughter nad received a personal sentence of 6 years . He accidentally ran over his niece when he was backing out of his driveway and was found with some alcohol in his system. His conviction would be equivalent to a conviction in Canada under s 249 of the criminal code of dangerous driving causing death. Which of the following statement is true?
Select one:
*peter would have to apply for individual rehabilitation if at least 5 years have passed since the completion of the imposed sentence for his crime
*peter would be deemed rehabilitated if at least 10 years have passed since the completion of the sentence imposed for his crime
*peter would have applied for individual rehabilitation if at least 5 years have passed since the date he was convicted
*peter would never be eligible for rehabilitation as his crime is considered serious in Canada
15.
