Interpretation of The power of Congress

In Hammer v. Dagenhart, the Court articulates a particular interpretation of the power of Congress, particularly with respect to the Commerce Clause. The Court also discusses the 10th Amendment. In US v. Darby, the Court offers a completely different interpretation of the Commerce Clause and the 10th Amendment. Summarize the Court’s interpretation in Dagenhart and then summarize the Court’s interpretation in Darby. What are the crucial differences? Which interpretation of the Constitution do you think is correct and why? How does the debate over the nature and meaning of the Commerce Clause and the 10th Amendment relate to contemporary politics today.