Read the following: The Real Reason White People Say ‘All Lives Matter Actions Black and Blue Clashes in Brooklyn reveal the state of NYC

Actions

Resisting Racist Propaganda Distorted

Actions

Respond to the following questions in a minimum of 500

1. What is your overall reaction to the collection of these texts?

2. How do you feel about the Huffington Post article, “The Real Reason White People Say ‘All Lives Matter'” call to action to “Join the Second Civil Rights Movement”?

3. What does the news article, “Black and Blue Clashes in Brooklynn reveal the state of NYC” say about the state of NYC?

4. According to “Resisting Racist Propaganda”, how do visuals relate to racist propaganda? How does Medina define “epistemic resistance” and “epistemic activism”?

5. Find an online image from the collection Reversed Lynchings and post it. Please give a brief description of how the artist reframed the image using digital manipulation.

Johnny Noneck, a street gang enforcer, was on trial for causing bodily harm and would likely face jail time for his crime.  The trial had finished for the day and the judge, Mr. Justice Tri Eroffact would give his decision the next morning.  On his way home that evening, Justice Eroffact was approached by a person who identified himself as a friend of Noneck.

The person offered the judge a substantial amount of money, in cash, if the judge agreed to find Noneck “not guilty” when delivering his decision the next morning.  Justice Eroffact agreed and pocketed an envelope filled with $100 bills. The next day, Noneck was found “not guilty” by Justice Eroffact.

Do Justice Tri Eroffact’s actions undermine the idea of rule of law? Why or why not? In your answer, explain how the rule of law is or is not undermined in this situation.

Which court possesses subject matter and personal jurisdiction as well as the venue? The firm’s client, who lives in Los Angeles, was flying from Los Angeles to Georgia on a direct flight. During the flight, the client attempted to use the restroom. When he opened the bathroom door, he interrupted a man who was on the toilet, sparking a violent confrontation between the client and the man. During the ruckus, both your firm’s client and the man who was originally using the toilet throw punches.

When the plane lands, the police charge your client with assault in Georgia. However, your firm’s client believes that Georgia is not the proper venue as he should be charged under the law of California or the law of the state over which plane was flying when the fight occurred. According to the flight records, the plane was flying over Tennessee and Alabama when the flight occurred.

Please provide your assigning attorney with research that can support her advice to the client about which court should hear this matter. Simply put, where should this case be filed?

First read the Principles for How We Treat Each Other.  You can access them at this link: Principles for how we treat each other.pdf The Principles help us interact with others in a more respectful, empathetic, and thoughtful manner. It is natural for a person to “fill in the blanks,” so to speak, when dealing with others. After all, we often do not know another person’s intentions, so we tend to project our own attitudes and feelings on other people. This is known as attribution error. This happens all the time and it does not mean you are a bad person. As an example, think about when someone cuts you off in traffic. What are your feelings?

What are your assumptions about the other driver? Did you think they were incompetent, a jerk, careless, or all of the above? Either of those assumptions could be true, or they could all be false. Applying the Principles in our lives gives us a chance to pause, check our assumptions, and turn to wonder when we do not understand the actions or attitudes of others. Consequently, by taking a second to reflect, we can filter out or better manage or biases in order to react in more respectful and empathetic manner. If you can accomplish this, you will be able to deal more effectively with conflict.

Journal Entry Guidelines:

Based on what you learned from the reading assignments in this module and interactions with your classmates, identify a Principle that most resonated with you during this module. Explain your reason for selecting the Principle and then describe how it helped you better understand the subject matter or relate to one of your classmates. Your journal entry will be private and I will be the only person reading your entry.

In addition, I want you to tell me one thing you learned in this module that you did not already know.  Be specific.

Hello, I need some assistance on these guiding questions. Thank you in advance! What is Collaborative Family Law (CFL)? How did CFL evolve? What is the history of CFL?
How is this process different from other ADR(Alternative dispute resolution ) that we have learned about?
Under what circumstances would CFL be appropriate? When would it be inappropriate?
Imagine you are a family lawyer in Alberta – would you offer CFL to your clients? Explain.
Long paragraphs 16 marks
Please answer in order, thanks!