What does succession planning entail

/in /by

What does succession planning entail and what are its essential steps?

Are there any disadvantages to using a nine-box grid (Using The 9-Box Grid With The Performance Values Matrix (workdove.com) ) for succession planning? Would you have any difficulty in categorizing anyone who reports or has reported to you into one of the boxes? If you never managed a team, think about employees you have worked with in the past and how you would categorize them.

Do you think most people frequently move from one box to another or do most people tend to stay in one box for long periods of their careers?

Conduct an assessment on the following body systems

/in /by

Conduct an assessment on the following body systems: Peripheral vascular, musculoskeletal and neurological

You may conduct the assessment on a fellow student, friend, or family member. Remember to secure their permission.

Collect both subjective and objective data using the process described in the textbook.

Write a summary of the assessment (subjective & objective data in narrative note) and the skills utilized. Answer the following 3 questions in the summary. Do not disclose any patient identifiers.

  1. What skills (assessment techniques) were utilized during the assessment?
  2. What subjective data did you collect? (list your findings)
  3. What objective data did you collect? (list your findings)

Why American Psychological Association Formatting Matters

/in /by

Why American Psychological Association Formatting Matters

Begin essay here. Be sure you have one-inch margins on all sides. If you are thinking to yourself, “Self, will my professor really know if I use 1.2 margins versus 1-inch margins? Would she really be so detailed as to look at all of her essays with a tape measurer in hand, no one is that detailed…” The answer is yes, yes she is and the tape measurer is red.

If you aren’t sure how to fix this or any other part of your format, use google to search for how to do it on your version of Microsoft Word and/or on your computer/laptop type. Formatting matters beyond the classroom because it can make or break whether your cover letter, resume, and/or job application get you a foot in the door. Further, if you ever decide to go into non-profit work or counseling, it can make or break your career, getting clients, and/or getting grant funding. Trust me, I worked in some of those fields before ever becoming a nerdy professor.

Be sure that you are using Times New Roman font size 12 only. This makes it easier for me to read & helps me grade more efficiently. I already work too much, help me stay a professor who cares by doing your part to prevent teacher burnout. Use paragraphs. A paragraph should never be as long as a full page of text.

Going over the page length is ok, as long as it’s not too long without saying anything important. Writing fewer than the required length (by any amount) will immediately cause you to lose points from your potential grade! Essays that are an appropriate length and have the right formatting (i.e. show real thought and effort) are the ones that have the potential for a perfect score. Incorrect formatting on any future essays will also cause you to lose even more points, as my disappointment grows when people don’t learn from feedback and past mistakes.

If you have problems with spacing you can highlight the text and right click. Select Paragraph, then click line spacing double or check the box that says, “Don’t add space between paragraphs.” Put it in your own words and cite.

Microsoft word is tricksy, so you may have to do this every time. If you want to site our amazing book or some other brilliant text you cite the text in APA format right after you discuss it. For example, our main text is awesome because it has some much useful information (Belsky, 2019). For APA format, if you are citing the author in the sentence, it goes a little differently. For example, Belsky’s (2019) book is less expensive than most lifespan development textbooks. Also, don’t quote in your essays.

Instead, put things in your own words and cite. If you want to note a particular term, do what I did earlier on the word paragraph, make it italic. Keep in mind that Word is a program to make your life easier, not a mastermind. It can be confused by typos that it in it (See that one there, No warning for me). It is important that you asses the essay yourself by carefully proofreading out loud (See it missed that one too).

One final comment, on grammar and writing style, be sure that you are using your commas appropriately, as well as your semi-colons; and not just throwing them around willy-nilly. They are to be respected. I know it can be difficult to figure out when to use a comma versus a semi-colon versus nothing at all. One helpful tool for me has been a website called Grammar Girl and another called The Oatmeal (you can find links to these in the FAQ). There are several helpful websites for the grammar and writing challenged.

Be sure that you cite at least two references, at minimum the book should be cited as well as one academic source such as (Bertl et. al., 2019). An essay that is eligible for a perfect score will have at least three references, and by references we mean peer reviewed research articles in the field of psychology published in the last decade.

Citation is several points of your grade. It’s hard to assess your ability to cite unless you cite something. The appropriate format for APA style is mentioned above for use within text. If you are citing something and are not sure of the appropriate format, you can use Purdue Owl or an APA Manual (again, links are in the FAQ).

Otherwise you can see below for a sample References page. Unlike this sample essay, References should always begin on the start of the last page. Remember, you must cite both in the text as well as in the References section. The sample References section below which already cites the textbook correctly to start you off on the right foot (Morris, 2013). I hope you found this essay on essays funny and helpful! It was not intended to be condescending, just a comical way of reinforcing essay format and providing a sample for your use.

References

Belsky, J. (2019). Experiencing the Lifespan. (5th ed). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

Bertl, B., Andrzejewski, D., Hyland, L., Shrivastava, A., Russell, D., & Pietschnig, J. (2019). My grade, my right: Linking academic entitlement to academic performance. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 775-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09509-2

Morris, M. (2013). The impact of attributions on academic performance: A test of the reformulated learned helplessness model. Social Sciences Directory, 2(2), 3-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7563/SSD_02_02_01

Doing Discussion Questions Right

/in /by

Before beginning work on this week’s discussion post, review the following resources: Doing Discussion Questions Right

 

From the below list, select one topic for which you will lead the discussion in the forum this week. Early in the week, reserve your selected topic by posting your response (reservation post) to the Discussion Area, identifying your topic in the subject line.

By the due date assigned, research your topic and start a scholarly conversation as you respond with your initial or primary post to your own reservation post in the Discussion Area. Make sure your response does not duplicate your colleagues’ responses.

  • Describe the purposes of a literature review.
  • Compare how literature reviews are used in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
  • Outline the steps in conducting a literature review.
  • Discuss the significance and meaning of a problem statement (or purpose statement).

Synthesize key concepts in a way that articulates a clear point, position, and conclusion supported by research. Select a different bullet point than what your classmates have already posted so that we can engage several discussions on relevant topics.

If all of the bullet points have been addressed, then you may begin to reuse the bullet points with the expectation that varied responses continue.

The final paragraph (three or four sentences) of your initial post should summarize the one or two key points that you are making in your initial response.

As the beginning of a scholarly conversation, your initial post should be:

  • Succinct—no more than 500 words.
  • Provocative—use concepts and combinations of concepts from the readings to propose relationships, causes, and/or consequences that inspire others to engage (inquire, learn). In other words, take a scholarly stand.
  • Supported—scholarly conversations are more than opinions. Ideas, statements, and conclusions are supported by clear research and citations from course materials as well as other credible, peer-reviewed resources.

Engage in a discussion with at least two colleagues and respond to questions from your professor by the end of the week.

For grading:

  • The reservation post and initial post are assessed in the rubric line item “Quality of initial posting.”
  • Neither the reservation post nor the initial post count toward days of participation.
  • Follow-up posts made throughout the week to your colleagues and professor will apply to participation points in the rubric.
  • All posts will be assessed for writing mechanics and information literacy. Be sure to review the expanded rubric for more details on grading criteria.

Doing Discussion Questions Right

/in /by

Before beginning work on this week’s discussion post, review the following resources: Doing Discussion Questions Right

Doing Discussion Questions Right

From the below list, select one topic for which you will lead the discussion in the forum this week. Early in the week, reserve your selected topic by posting your response (reservation post) to the Discussion Area, identifying your topic in the subject line.

By the due date assigned, research your topic and start a scholarly conversation as you respond with your initial or primary post to your own reservation post in the Discussion Area. Make sure your response does not duplicate your colleagues’ responses.

  • Examine the steps in the Week 4 research project flowchart in the lecture. Synthesize the key outcomes of each step. Critique the possible drawbacks of each step. Assess drawbacks for relevance to your research.
  • Synthesize the key requirements for internal validity of a research project. Assess potential hindrances to internal validity and assess measures to overcome the hindrances. Justify how the selected measures might overcome the hindrances.
  • Synthesize key elements of a research design. Synthesize the major types of research designs. Justify which types of designs are most appropriate for social science research.
  • Summarize the major steps in the analysis phase of a research project. Assess the hindrances to a proper analysis.

Synthesize key concepts in a way that articulates a clear point, position, and conclusion supported by research. Select a different bullet point than what your classmates have already posted so that we can engage several discussions on relevant topics. If all of the bullet points have been addressed, then you may begin to reuse the bullet points with the expectation that varied responses continue.

The final paragraph (three or four sentences) of your initial post should summarize the one or two key points that you are making in your initial response.

As the beginning of a scholarly conversation, your initial post should be:

  • Succinct—no more than 500 words.
  • Provocative—use concepts and combinations of concepts from the readings to propose relationships, causes, and/or consequences that inspire others to engage (inquire, learn). In other words, take a scholarly stand.
  • Supported—scholarly conversations are more than opinions. Ideas, statements, and conclusions are supported by clear research and citations from course materials as well as other credible, peer-reviewed resources.

Engage in a discussion with at least two colleagues and respond to questions from your professor by the end of the week.

For grading:

  • The reservation post and initial post are assessed in the rubric line item “Quality of initial posting.”
  • Neither the reservation post nor the initial post count toward days of participation.
  • Follow-up posts made throughout the week to your colleagues and professor will apply to participation points in the rubric.
  • All posts will be assessed for writing mechanics and information literacy. Be sure to review the expanded rubric for more details on grading criteria.

Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal theory in Nursing

/in /by

Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal theory in Nursing. Peplau’s interpersonal theory is one of the most influential theories in nursing. Peplau’s theory provides a framework for nurses to understand and address the psychological needs of patients.

Peplau’s theory has been used to guide nursing education, research, and practice (Wasaya et al., 2021. p. 368). Peplau’s work shaped how psychiatric nurses view and treat their patients.

Hildegard Peplau was a German-American nurse and psychoanalyst best known for her contributions to psychiatric nursing. However, she is best known for her theory of interpersonal relations, which she first proposed in 1952 (Reed & Hall, 2018, p. 314). Hildegard Peplau was born in Germany in 1909. She emigrated to the United States in 1927 and began her nursing career in New York City.

Peplau received her nursing diploma from the New York Hospital Training School for Nurses in 1931. She then completed a psychiatric nursing certificate at the Worcester State Hospital in Massachusetts (Forchuk, 2021, p. 7). Peplau completed her psychiatric nursing training at the Menninger Clinic in Kansas and became a certified psychiatric nurse in 1943.

Peplau also received a degree in psychoanalysis from the William Alanson White Institute in New York City. She began teaching at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing in 1947 and was appointed a full professor in 1963.

Peplau was awarded the American Psychiatric Association’s Distinguished Service Award in 1974 and the American Nurses Association’s Lifetime Achievement Award in 1983. Peplau retired from teaching in 1976 but remained active in nursing research and practice. She died in 1999. Peplau’s major accomplishment was her theory of interpersonal relations (Reed & Hall, 2018, p. 314).

Her theory has been influential in the development of nursing education and practice and has been cited as a significant contribution to the field of psychiatric nursing.

Peplau’s most significant contribution to the psychiatric nursing field was her interpersonal relations theory. Peplau’s theory proposed that the nurse-patient relationship is central to healing. In addition, Peplau believed that the nurse-patient relationship could be used to facilitate the patients’ self-understanding and growth (Forchuk, 2021, p. 9). Peplau’s theory has been highly influential in developing psychiatric nursing as a profession.

Peplau’s other accomplishments include her work on the first edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and her work on the development of the Nurses’ Mental Health Association.

The Theory’s Core Concepts

The core concepts of Hildegard Peplau’s interpersonal theory are:

The nurse-patient relationship is the key to successful nursing care: The nurse-patient relationship is the foundation of successful nursing care. First, the nurse-patient relationship is based on trust, respect, and communication (Wasaya et al., 2021. p. 369).

The nurse-patient relationship is therapeutic, in which the nurse uses her knowledge and skills to help the patient meet his or her needs. Finally, the nurse-patient relationship is dynamic in which both parties learn from and influence each other.

The patient is seen as an individual with unique needs: The patient is seen as an individual with unique needs. The nurse must individualize the care she provides to each patient, considering the patient’s unique circumstances and needs (Carvalho & Cordeiro, 2018, p. 53). The nurse-patient relationship is based on mutual trust and respect: The nurse-patient relationship is based on mutual trust and respect.

The nurse must be honest with the patient and respect the patient’s privacy and dignity. The patient must be able to trust the nurse to provide competent and compassionate care.

The nurse-patient relationship is a therapeutic one, in which the nurse uses her knowledge and skills to help the patient meet his or her needs: The nurse-patient relationship is a therapeutic one, in which the nurse uses her knowledge and skills to help the patient meet his or her needs (Forchuk, 2021, p. 11).

The nurse-patient relationship is dynamic in which both parties learn from and influence each other. The nurse and the patient have a role to play in the relationship, and both parties can learn from and influence each other.

Relevance

Theorist’s Connection to the Theory

Hildegard Peplau was born in Reading, Pennsylvania, in 1909. She attended the University of Pennsylvania and graduated with a degree in psychiatric nursing in 1931. Peplau then went on to work as a psychiatric nurse at a hospital in New York City. In 1953, she became a professor at the same hospital, where she taught until her retirement in 1976.

Peplau’s interpersonal theory is based on the belief that the nurse-client relationship is therapeutic in nature and that the nurse is a professional with a unique body of knowledge that can be used to help the client (Dal’Bosco et al., 2021, p. 75).

The nurse-client relationship is seen as a dyadic relationship in which both the nurse and the client are equal partners. The client is seen as an active participant in his or her care, and the nurse is seen as a resource to the client. The goal of the nurse-client relationship is to help the client meet his or her needs and promote health and well-being.

Theory Connection to Today’s Healthcare

The interpersonal theory is relevant to healthcare today as it emphasizes the importance of the nurse-client relationship in promoting health and well-being. The theory is also relevant to the client, as it emphasizes the importance of the client being an active participant in their care.

Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal theory is still relevant today because it emphasizes the importance of the nurse-patient relationship (Cacayan et al., 2021, p. 247). This theory is based on the idea that the nurse and patient must work together to achieve the best possible outcome.

The nurse must be able to understand the patient’s needs and be able to provide the necessary support. The patient must also be willing to participate in their care. This theory is still relevant because it emphasizes the importance of communication and collaboration between the nurse and patient.

Application to Research and Practice

Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal theory is highly relevant to current research and practice. The theory provides a framework for understanding and predicting human behavior and can be applied to various settings. Peplau’s work has been highly influential in developing nursing research and practice, and her theory is still widely used today.

Hildegard Peplau’s interpersonal theory can be applied to research and practice in several ways. For example, the theory can help explain and predict human behavior in social situations. The theory can study the dynamics of human relationships, examine how people interact with one another, and investigate how people develop and change over time (Dal’Bosco et al., 2021, p. 75).

Additionally, the theory can guide interventions and treatments for mental and emotional disorders. These interventions and therapies aim at improving the quality of people’s lives and interpersonal relationships. The theory can also be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and therapies.

The theory can be used to inform educational programs and public policy initiatives aimed at promoting healthy social interactions. The theory can be used to study a wide range of topics, including communication, conflict resolution, and socialization.

The interpersonal theory of Hildegard Peplau states that each individual has a unique set of interpersonal needs and that these needs are met through interactions with others (Wasaya et al., 2021, p. 23). According to the theory, people constantly strive to satisfy their interpersonal needs through relationships with others. When people cannot meet their needs, they may experience psychological distress. The theory posits that the quality of their relationships determines the quality of people’s lives.

Summary

Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal theory is a psychodynamic theory that emphasizes the importance of interpersonal relationships in developing and maintaining mental health.

The theory is based on the premise that humans are social beings who need to interact with others to feel fulfilled and mentally healthy (Forchuk, 2021, p. 5). The theory also posits that mental health is a product of the interaction between the individual and their social environment.

The strength of this theory is its emphasis on the importance of social relationships in mental health. The theory is also based on sound psychological principles and has been supported by research (Forchuk, 2021, p. 13). Additionally, the theory can be used to explain how social relationships can be used to improve mental health. However, the theory has some limitations.

For example, it does not consider individual differences or biology’s role in mental health. Additionally, the theory does not explain how social relationships can be used to improve mental health.

 

References

Cacayan, E. B., Alvarado, A. E., Esmundo, O. A., Cruz, A. D., Felix, F. C., Franco, D., & Galima, J. M. D. (2021). Nursing Therapy in Dealing with Anxiety of COVID-19 Patients Based on the Model of Interpersonal Relations of Hildegard Peplau. Health Notions, 5(07), 232-341. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-1644653

Carvalho, J. C., & Cordeiro, R. A. (2018). Theories of interpersonal relationships, transitions, and humanistic theories: Contribution to psychiatric/mental health nursing frameworks in Europe. In European Psychiatric/Mental Health Nursing in the 21st Century (pp. 49-58). Springer, Cham. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319317717

Dal’Bosco, E. B., Floriano, L. S. M., Rangel, A. G. S. S., Ribas, M. C., Cavalheiro, A. P. G., Silva, C. L. D., & Cabral, L. P. A. (2021). Coping in mental health during social isolation: analysis in light of Hildegard Peplau. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 75. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34614099/

Forchuk, C. (2021). Overview of Peplau’s Theory. In From Therapeutic Relationships to Transitional Care (pp. 3-15). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003000853-21/overview-peplau-theory-cheryl-forchuk

Reed, M., & Hall, S. (2018). 21 THERAPEUTIC ENGAGEMENT FOR. Essentials of Mental Health Nursing, 314. https://www.worldcat.org/isbn/9781526447166

Wasaya, F., Shah, Q., Shaheen, A., & Carroll, K. (2021). Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations: A case study. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(4), 368-371. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34538167/

Wasaya, F., Zulfiqar, S., & Farhan, A. (2021). A Comparison and Integration of Two Nursing Theories into Clinical Practice: Betty Neuman and Hildegard Peplau. i-Manager’s Journal on Nursing, 11(3), 4. 17-28.. https://imanagerpublications.com/article/17881/

 

Oral History/Interview

/in /by

Oral History/Interview: The purpose of this assignment is to give you the opportunity to apply what you’ve already learned about primary and secondary research and to take it a step further: You will explore a discourse community with which you are unfamiliar, learn as much as you can through secondary research, and conduct an oral history interview in order to fill gaps in your knowledge. Here is a brief outline of your research journey:

  • Choose a discourse community. Please choose a community with which you are unfamiliar and would like to learn more about.
  • Develop a research question. What questions do you still have about the community? Narrow your focus by synthesizing your research (see next bullet point).
  • Research your community via secondary sources (you will need at least five for your synthesis matrix). This may include scholarly or non-scholarly sources, including a local history museum or historical society. It is important to stay cognizant of which sources will be helpful to you in learning about your community and why. Additionally, record a running list of questions about the community as your research.
  • Conduct 30-minute interview. The person you interview must be willing to be audio recorded. In preparation for the interview, you will develop interview questions (these are different from your research question) and acquire audio recording equipment (If you have a smart phone, you can download a free app called “Otter.”) See also the following resources:
  • 5 Best Audio Recording Apps for Android https://www.scriptosphere.com/5-best-audio-recording-apps-android/
  • Audio recording apps for iPhone https://www.guidingtech.com/audio-recording-apps-iphone/
  • Blackboard will accept the following file types for audio: Audio: AIFF, MP3, MIDI, MP, WAV, and WMA.
  • Remember: you need to get a signed consent form from the participant prior to completing the interview. See Blackboard for a consent form you must adapt for your use.
  • Write a five- to six-page essay that profiles the discourse community you have chosen to research. It must include at least five sources (one primary (i.e., interview) and four secondary). It must include an abstract and cover page that do not count towards the page count.

 

The purpose of this assignment is multifaceted: (1) To develop your understanding of discourse communities by analyzing both explicit and implicit manifestations of culture within a discourse community with which you are unfamiliar. (2) Build upon prior knowledge of primary research to include conducting interviews. (3) Reflect on how inquiry contributes to a life of significance and worth. (4) Reinforce prior knowledge of locating and synthesizing secondary sources.

The Library databases

/in /by

Using the library databases, select one in-depth article from a well-respected academic business journal related to your area of interest. Use supplemental journal articles to support or refute your primary article.

  • Critique the journal article, including assumptions, clarity, interpretation of data, relevance, methodology, and information literacy.
  • Assess how you might address the points raised by your critique (previous bullet point), including how you might improve or build on the approach, methods, hypotheses, and conclusions in the article.
  • Integrated supplemental articles using a well-reasoned style and objective approach.

Submission Details:

  • Complete your response to this assignment in a 4-5-page Microsoft Word document, using APA style.
  • Name the document SU_BUS7000_W3_LastName_FirstInitial.doc
  • By the due date assigned, submit the document to the Submissions Area.

The extent and Impact of business issues

/in /by

Students observe and become aware of the extent and impact of business issues occurring at local, state-wide, national, and international venues.

· Students learn to write and comment fluidly about issues of business interest.

· Students learn to tag information with a source/provider and date.

· Students integrate course and study information with current business events.

· Student journal/log observations furnish training for tasks and skills needed in professional work and assessments.

· Students utilize complex thinking that investigates ideas arising in sudden and intuitive contexts and develops them with constructive research.

A Journal having five entries will be reviewed and graded. The Journal exercise has a purpose and format.

Purpose

The world’s media daily release their version of business, political, and social messages that impacts our global societies. These dynamics reveal who we are and what we are about in our era. Business students must be alert to this stream of information that shows both norm and change in broad categories of activities.

When attending classes, students can learn to recognize intriguing ideas, jot them down, and investigate them further in a journal manner. When outside of the classroom, they can snatch ideas from conversations, gatherings, viewings and broadcasts. The trick (and effort) is to get the idea entered into a journal format.

The private business journal (log) is a professional tool. There can be two versions: the At-work log/journal and the At-home journal. The At-work log has notes that tell what you were occupied with during mornings and afternoons every business day. It is similar to a vehicle log kept while on the road doing appointments.

The private journal at home is the place for commentary about activities, opinions and reservations about current business issues, and modeling your personal profile and development. It exists for the final comment about that day.

Journals help keep you sharp and alert. Writing down and further researching an idea establishes it in memory. Retrieving and drawing from that memory allows a professional to gain notice through reasonable discourse about relevant issues moving through the work place.

Older journal entries (histories) can furnish background important to current discussions in the business place. Merging history with current issues helps “sell” a position you take on an issue.

Journal observance is more than note taking and simple reporting – it is a medium that merges insight with problem arrangement / ordering and solution. It can be a force that leads to business solutions and entrepreneurial vision. Journal experience is a critical communication tool.

Journal/Log Notation Formats

The journal/log can be strictly digital and set up as a continuous word-processing program or a computer document. The old and original style of doing journals is putting hand-written entries into a journal notebook. Of this kind, a successful model used by authors, artists, and scientists is a spiral notebook or three-hole binder and paper. Inside it, bend a blank sheet in half along the vertical axis.

On the left side, jot down a business idea or note. Add a date, time, and source for this entry. “Source” is what brought it to your attention. In formal research, this becomes a tagged reference. On the right side, examine the item. For instance, “Why does this thing attract my notice? Is it a simple distraction, or is it more than that? Does this thing have a larger reality that I’m not aware of? Does it affect me?” This examination can proceed to Internet or library research when serious attention begins.

Journal Composition

An At-work daily log can be a simple annotation done with bullets or short sentences in simple paragraphs, and these logs can be either hand written or digital entries. An At-work log or journal also can be more involved, as its subject can be an event that has depth and detail and points to more events, consequences, or developments.

One example is impending layoffs that move from rumor to actual stages of cutting the workforce. Each stage in this process could be a separate journal entry, as each stage has its own special details, dynamics, and dates.

This way of “seeing” an event applies to any recognition of an idea or event that captures our attention and interest. As business people and students, we daily become aware of business ideas and events swirling around us in classrooms, discussions, media presentations, periodicals, internet articles, local events in the business community, and our own inspirations. These business ideas and events, inside and outside the workplace, are topics for the Journal assignment.

Journal Submittal Format For This Assignment

· In word-processing, start a Journal page and save it as a file. Save it in a manner that you can return to and add new entries in it.

· Top left margin: Student Name BCOM 3304-Section Number

· Each of the journal entries shows a common format:

Title Date Source Notation

· Create a Title that effectively points at a main issue in the topic. The Date is when you became aware of this topic. The Source Notation is what presented or brought you the topic. If it’s from the Web, either a simple www.Source.com or full URL is okay.

· Write out your impressions and interest about this item of notice. I don’t expect any hard research done on an entry! The Journal is an awareness – developing tool!

· Two to three paragraphs is a normal entry. The first paragraph introduces the topic, gives background, and introduces your viewpoint and interest in it.

The second paragraph gives details and briefly explains the issue(s) you deem relevant, and the third paragraph provides your comments and take on the subject, then closure.

· The Journal has five (5) entries covering three to four pages total. 100 points.

· The Journal entry may be relaxed and off-the-cuff, but the writing style is not. It’s formal! I’ll put a marking pen to punctuation errors, misspellings, and junk sentences, and a flow of editing ink grants a loss of points. This journal shows your business persona, as does every exercise in this course. Get professional and proficient with editing!

Grading Assessment and Rubric

Competence: 0-80 points

· Paragraphs intelligently communicate a business topic to an audience.

· Sentences link and promote topic ideas.

· Each entry is introduced by topic title, observation time, and source.

· Topic is clearly related and relevant to business or a School of Business discipline.

· Writing style is objective and appropriate for explaining a topic.

Grammar: 0-10 points

· Writing is free of misspellings.

· Writing is free of run-ons and modifier problems.

· Sentences show variety and good construction.

· Sentences have clauses and phrases logically connected.

· In general, grammatically correct writing is required.

Punctuation and Mechanics: 0-10 points

· Writing has few or no punctuation errors.

· Writing shows proper capitalization and proper handling of hyphens, dashes, quotation marks, and other mechanic conventions.

· Writing having figures and numbers follows APA conventions regarding their use.

Maximum Journal score: 100 points

Innovators and entrepreneurs who built very successful businesses

/in /by

How I Built This is a Podcast about innovators and entrepreneurs who built very successful businesses. Listen to  Method:Adam Lovry and Eric Ryan and comment on:

1. The personalities of Adam and Eric,

2. Luck as a factor in their success, and

3. What did you learn from the podcast? List two things that would help another entrepreneur. .

About 250 words.

listen the podcast by using the below link

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654506019/method-adam-lowry-eric-ryan