Budget maximizing strategies

age 51 Menifield provides a list of budget maximizing strategies adapted from other scholars. Considering contemporary politics and based on experience in an organization in which you participate or follow (or just good old common sense), discuss the following:

Which two strategies do you think would be most consistently effective? Is there a strategy that seems absolutely essential?

Which strategy seems the shadiest and most likely to fail?

Historical origins of libertarian thought

Describe the historical origins of libertarian thought.  What economic and political situation are libertarians responding to? Describe the libertarian attitude towards taxation.  How does this view connect to the core value(s) of libertarian thought?

In “Classical Liberalism as an Organizing Ideal,” James Buchanan speaks about the “services of a choicemaker.” To whom (or to what) is Buchanan referring?  Is such a “choicemaker” necessary?  Why or why not?

James Buchanan is very suspicious of the state.  Why?  Why, in his opinion, are states typically so ineffective at managing the economy?

What, according to John Williamson, is the Washington Consensus?  What sorts of policies does it endorse?  And which important institutions have adopted its institutional and policy recommendations?

Need for the 14th Amendment

What was need for the 14th Amendment, why were southern states required to pass the amendment and why did many resist, and what year did it finally become law?

Who did the Amendment help and how did it help them – and who did it leave out? Why were women upset?

What issues from the document are still controversial today? How does it relate to current situation with immigration?

Also, how is the style and content of the original document different from the secondary account provided in the textbook?  Which is more important, or do they complement each other

Supposed violation of civil liberties

Cases in US History which deal with a supposed violation of civil liberties. Please answer the following questions based on what you learned from the module and your understanding of civil liberties as protected by the Bill of Rights and the 14th amendment.

1. Tell me whether or not you think each case violated Americans’  civil liberties. If you believe they do, please tell me which liberty/amendment is being violated and HOW. If you believe the legislation/order was constitutional, please explain HOW.  Please be specific about your connection.

Make sure you address each case.

2, What do all of these instances have in common? Given their commonalities, does that make them more or less justified?

Regionally based grievances

Regionally based grievances, such as Western alienation and Quebec separatism, are a defining feature of Canadian politics. Identify and explain 3 features of Canadian political institutions that contribute to these regional rifts. (Considerations may include Canadian federalism, theories of confederation, representation in the legislative branch, and the electoral system).

Canadian federalism: Federalism is a political system in which government power and responsibility is divided between a federal legislature and state or provincial legislatures.  The Canadian federalism has brought the differences in Canada by considering smaller parts not sovereign and therefore cannot legally secede. It has swung between the extremes of centralizing control and decentralizing it.

The federal government has jurisdiction over the entire country and each provincial government has jurisdiction over its portion of the population and region. Both levels of government get their authority from Canada’s written Constitution but it includes features that are incompatible with a strict approach to federalism. Canadian federalism has been tested throughout the country’s history and remains a subject of great debate.

Theories of confederation in Canada: The Canadian Confederation was the process by which the three colonies of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were united into one federation called the Dominion of Canada on July 1, 1867. Over the years since Confederation, Canada has seen numerous territorial changes and expansions which has resulted in the current number of ten provinces and three territories. There has been an extensive scholarly debate on the role of political ideas in Canada confederation. For example, most traditional historians regarded Canadian Confederation as an exercise in political pragmatism that was essentially non-ideological.

In the 1960s, historian Peter Waite derided the references to political philosophers in the legislative debates on Confederation as “hot air”. According to him, Confederation was driven by pragmatic brokerage politics and competing interest groups. Again in 1987, political scientist Peter J. Smith challenged the view of the Canadian Confederation as one that was non-ideological.

Smith argued Confederation was motivated by new political ideologies as much as the American and French Revolutions and Canadian Confederation was driven by a Court Party ideology. In 2000, a journal article and  historian called  Ian McKay argued that Canadian Confederation was motivated by the ideology of liberalism and the belief in the supremacy of individual rights.

McKay described Confederation as part of the classical liberal project of creating a liberal order in northern North America. This has caused regional differences as some regions are in support for the confederation while others are against it.The Canadian electoral system: Canada naturally adopted

British institutions of electoral democracy. Elections in Canada use a first-past-the-post system, whereby the candidate that wins the most votes in a constituency is selected to represent that riding. Elections are governed by an elaborate series of laws and a well-developed administrative apparatus.

They occur at the federal, provincial, territorial and municipal levels. Canada’s federal election system is governed by the Canada Elections Act and administered by the Chief Electoral Officer while provincial election systems, governed by provincial election acts.

The Canadian electoral system creates regional rifts in that some electoral positions in some regions are contested through parties while others are contested by individual.  For example, federal and provincial campaigns and that of Yukon, are party contests in which candidates represent political parties while municipal campaigns  and those of Northwest Territories and Nunavut, are contested by individuals, not by parties.

China’s economy and globalization 

China’s economy and globalization  has recovered quickly while many other parts of the world are still battling waves of coronavirus outbreaks.Reasons why  the world needs Globalization rather than a retreat into protectionism Historically, China was a trading nation, and it continues to be one today. China is now the world’s largest trading nation, accounting for 13.2 per cent of global goods exports and nearly 11 per cent of global imports And that upward trend shows no sign of abating, especially in the Covid-19 era

The first half of 2021 saw China’s total trade volume increase by 27.1 per cent, with exports expanding 28.1 per cent and imports by 25.9 per cent. China is also rapidly becoming a major provider of outbound investment funds, as the world’s industrial manufacturing clusters begin to move to countries with lower labour costs.

 

Jose Rizal last farewell

explain the one of the stanzas of Jose Rizal last farewell. Write it with precision and clarity.

 

“I die just when I see the dawn break,

Through the gloom of night, to herald the day;

And if color is lacking my blood, thou shalt take

Pour’d out at need for thy dear sake,

To dye with its crimson the waking ray”

Supreme Court case United States v. Zubaydah

Thoughts on the Supreme Court case United States v. Zubaydah are that the court ruled incorrectly 7-2 in decision to the United States.

Zayn Husayn, also known as Abu Zubaydah, is a former associate of Osama bin Laden and was captured in Pakistan by US military and transported to Guantanamo Bay, but prior to arriving in Guantanamo Bay he was detailed at a CIA site in Poland.

Zubaydah alleges to have been tortured at that facility in Poland. Zubaydah’s request for discovery was initially granted by the Ninth Circuit US Court of appeals, however, it was overturned by the Supreme Court.

It was both Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissenting opinions that I felt made the most sense. Justice Kagan said it is both possible to use the State Secret Privilege to protect the location of the classified location in Poland while at the same time granting discovery into the enhanced interrogation techniques used as torture should not be allowed.

Meanwhile Justice Gorsuch’s dissenting opinion makes the best case in my opinion that given the fact that the alleged events took place twenty years ago and have been declassified already, not to mention those events have been the subject of various forms of media such as numerous books and movies. Due to the facts Justice Gorsuch lays out, it makes no sense to use any State Secret Privilege as there aren’t any secrets to be safeguarded.

Conducting  a leadership analysis on Hannibal

Conducting  a leadership analysis on Hannibal. What were the key leadership actions, qualities, styles….etc. that directly resulted in his success as a leader? In other words, what was his legacy as a leader?
Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart was successful by learning lessons from Hannibal of Carthage.
Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart failed by not learning lessons from Hannibal of Carthage
You must think deeper in terms of being more specific when using evidence/examples; not to be too general when supporting your argument/concept—use specific examples.  One example is: when you discuss making better relations (this is too general), state specifically how he made better relations.

Gender or sex-based inequalities

Summarize the literature covered in class related to gender or sex-based inequalities. How do these authors analyze and critique the issue of gender or sex-based inequalities? How do at least two authors define patriarchy and its negative impacts on both men and women, and show certain people can benefit from America’s patriarchal system? What solutions do they offer both the oppressed and the oppressor when looking to remedy these issues? Give at least two examples to support your answer.